Making changes to an Ad-Hoc's details #273
Conversation
shaeespring
added
Ballot Pending
|
Active Members: 69 Passed ✅ |
shaeespring
added
Ballot Passed
and removed
Ballots Issued
|
Is this good to merge in now? |
constitution.tex
Outdated
| \item When a group of members feels an Ad Hoc Directorship is necessary, they present their plans to E-Board. | ||
| An E-Board Vote is taken to determine whether directorship status is granted. | ||
| \item When the Ad Hoc Directorship is granted status, a director is appointed, and duties, budget, and membership considerations are defined. | ||
| \item E-Board may approve changes of an Ad Hoc's director, duties, budget, or membership considerations by an E-Board Vote |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a period at the end of the line.
|
IMO, it should be a constitutional maintainer reviewing. Even though House should've read the amendments and caught any syntactical errors, I don't really trust them. |
|
Although now I don't know what to do constitutionally when the ballot passes, but there's a syntactical error |
|
Combining a non-semantic and a semantic change in the same PR. The semantic part passed HM already. The maintainer reviewed the period and passed the review. For future PRs, I will try to get maintainers to review PR before the vote |
I did an approval on these PRs since they had passed, and since nobody else had already hit approve on a review, I thought that was why they had yet to be merged. |
Check one:
Summary of change(s):
Requires an E-Board Vote to change the details of an Ad Hoc
Is currently undefined in the constitution, but there is precedent